Does competent leadership equal transaction success?

  • Blog
  • 5 minute read
  • April 20, 2026

The deals environment is complex, with multiple demands on the workforce over and above the day-to-day operations. Investors or shareholders will often place further pressure on leadership such as aggressive targets and shorter deal timelines. Overcoming these complex dynamics can be attributed to a competent and stable leadership team; however, it is not always the complete solution, and not always quite as simple as that.  As such, when entering a deals transaction, leadership dynamics, stability, and competencies need to be carefully considered either when investing in a business, or when preparing a business for sale or expansion.

In today’s dynamic and ever-changing business environment, the success of any strategic plan depends not merely on its design but rather on the capability of those responsible for executing it, and the leadership team plays a pivotal role in turning vision into tangible value. Strong financial performance can often create a sense of comfort, masking gaps in leadership capability that may only surface when conditions become more challenging. In many instances, it is just presumed that the leaders are competent enough to continue to take the business to the next level if the financials are currently healthy, especially if it is a friendly transaction.

Woman looking up at office buildings

Strategic and financial buyers, whether private equity funds, acquisitive corporates, or institutional investors, often overlook a fundamental component of due diligence: assessing the skills, competence, and capability of the target company’s leadership teams. This is not just a governance tick box, but a strategic necessity.

A leadership team that lacks alignment, competence, or capacity can derail acquisition efforts, hinder growth, and ultimately diminish deal value. To mitigate these risks and unlock the full potential of a transaction, a leadership assessment should be the cornerstone of any investment or acquisition strategy.

When assessing the leadership team, it’s essential to look beyond academic qualifications and formal titles

While education lays the groundwork for strategic thinking and technical understanding (especially in a highly specialised environment), it’s the experience gained through years of navigating complex, real-world business environments that truly shape effective leaders.

  • It’s not just the years of experience that counts, but more so the relevance and depth of the experience
  • Leaders who have successfully scaled a business, managed business acquisitions and assisted in preparing a business for sale or expansion, or driven innovation, bring a level of insight and operational maturity that cannot be replaced through credentials alone. Their ability to apply hard-earned lessons, adapt to evolving market conditions and lead with confidence under pressure is often the defining factor in a company’s ability to execute its strategy
  • Evaluating this kind of experience is critical since it provides a more accurate picture of whether the leadership team is equipped to deliver value during and after a transaction. It not only reflects their capacity to maintain performance, but also their ability to unlock new opportunities. Organisational structure serves as a proxy for leadership effectiveness

Understanding the company’s organisational structure provides valuable insights into how leadership operates, delegates, and drives performance. It’s not just about hierarchy, but how effectively the leadership team mobilises talent and resources to execute strategy.

  • In a deal environment, the organisational structure signals how ready the leadership team is for acquisition or growth. Generally, structures that support cross-functional collaboration, agility, and decision-making speed are better positioned for post-deal success
  • Clear, well-defined reporting lines suggest a leadership team that values accountability and operational clarity (regardless of the size of the operations)
  • The size and composition of teams reporting to executives can reveal whether leadership is appropriately resourced to deliver strategic objectives
  • A balanced structure allows leaders to maintain oversight while empowering middle management to execute with autonomy

Budgets, performance targets, and accountability metrics are not just operational tools

They are strategic instruments that reflect the discipline, foresight, and execution capability of executive management.

  • A well-structured budget reflects more than financial discipline; it demonstrates the leadership team’s level of understanding of the business model and market dynamics. It also reflects their ability to anticipate challenges, allocate resources effectively, and plan for growth
  • Performance targets serve as a mirror to leadership ambition and realism. The ability to set balanced, data-informed goals and cascade them clearly and consistently across the organisation is a hallmark of a capable and aligned executive team
  • Accountability metrics complete the picture. They demonstrate whether leadership is managing outcomes or simply reacting to circumstances. Clear KPIs, transparent reporting structures, and a culture of ownership are essential to driving performance and ensuring that strategic plans are executable

Leadership alignment versus strategic vision

Even the most technically skilled and experienced leadership team can underperform if their strategic priorities are misaligned with those of the acquiring or investing entity.

  • Leadership alignment is critical and requires a deep understanding of how the target company’s leadership team thinks about growth, risk, innovation, and value creation
  • Misalignment can manifest in subtle but damaging ways, such as conflicting priorities, resistance to acquisition and subsequent integration, or divergent leadership styles. Where leadership teams hold fundamentally different values, communication norms, or decision-making approaches, deal value can be eroded if these issues are not identified early. Such misalignment can slow down decision making, create internal friction, and dilute the strategic impact of the deal

In any investment or acquisition, the leadership team is the driving force behind turning strategy into results. Assessing their skills, competence, and capabilities is central to determining whether the business can deliver on its strategic goals and objectives. Financials may tell you where a company has been, but it is leadership ability that determines where it’s going.

A thorough leadership assessment equips investors and acquirers with the insight needed to make informed decisions, mitigate risk, and unlock long-term value. In today’s high-stakes, fast-moving deals environment, overlooking leaderships capabilities is not just a missed opportunity; it’s a strategic blind spot.

To learn more about how our team can support you in a deal process, visit our People in Deals page here.

Follow us

Contact us

Jaco Prinsloo

Jaco Prinsloo

Director | Value Creation, PwC South Africa

Sasha Franicevic

Sasha Franicevic

Senior Manager, PwC South Africa

Tel: +27 (0) 11 797 4000

Marizaan Vermeulen

Marizaan Vermeulen

Manager, PwC South Africa

Tel: +27 (0) 11 797 4000

Hide